Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice

: 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 78--82

Consumer's satisfaction with community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan

Yun Jin Kim1, Muhammad Shahzad Aslam1, Syed Muhammad Fahim2, Waris Ali Khan3, Linchao Qian1,  
1 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen University Malaysia, Sepang, Malaysia
2 Institute of Business Management, Karachi, Pakistan
3 Faculty of Business Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Muhammad Shahzad Aslam
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen University Malaysia, Sepang


Objective: The present research is the first comprehensive cross-sectional study of consumer satisfaction with community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan. Moreover, the study has also designed a nonorder theoretical model for consumer satisfaction with community pharmacies. Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study from a general population of Sindh, Pakistan, with a total of four hundred and fifteen (n = 415) participants. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the factor structure between Pharmaceutical services (PS), the Skill of Pharmacists, Non-pharmaceutical services (NPS), and pricing (P). Pearson correlation analysis, Kendall's tau correlation analysis, and Spearman's rho correlation analysis were used to identify the correlation between different factors, such as PS, SKP, NPS, and P. Findings: The 23-item scale that consisted of four elements have shown an acceptable root mean squared error of approximation (0.076), Cronbach's alpha (0.787), and Chi-square value (3.381) (P < 0.001). Of the respondents, 56.4% rated their satisfaction on pharmacist attitude, whereas 67.2%, 41.4%, and 51.8% were satisfied with other services, such as receipt provided on medication they take, prescription drug service and availability of pharmacies on the weekend and public holidays, respectively Conclusion: This cross-sectional study confirms that there are relationships among PS, SPK, NPS, and P. Moreover, there is a lack of facilities in community pharmacies in Sindh, such as the unavailability of a consultation room, immunization services, information on routine health matters, and medication record.

How to cite this article:
Kim YJ, Aslam MS, Fahim SM, Khan WA, Qian L. Consumer's satisfaction with community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan.J Res Pharm Pract 2021;10:78-82

How to cite this URL:
Kim YJ, Aslam MS, Fahim SM, Khan WA, Qian L. Consumer's satisfaction with community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan. J Res Pharm Pract [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 28 ];10:78-82
Available from:

Full Text


Increasing the role of pharmacists in public health would entail improvements in both the pharmacists and the general public.[1] Pharmacists in the community can provide an insight into the integration and management of chronic disease programs and health promotion.[2] Quality services and consumer satisfaction play vital roles in behavior intention.[3] Consumer satisfaction is likely to affect the image of the pharmacist and the pharmacy profession.[4] Nitadpakorn et al.[5] determined that the customers' perceptions of pharmacists play an indirect role in pharmacy customer devotion through pharmacy engagement. The National Prescribing Service (NPS) was introduced in 1997, which supports pharmaceutical education and provides interactive services between health professionals and consumers. Its role is to develop comprehensive consumer education about medicine.[6]

Several cross-sectional studies have identified the prevalence of patient satisfaction from pharmaceutical services (PS) in different countries, such as Brazil,[7] Slovakia,[8] Lebanon,[9] Nigeria,[10] Malaysia,[11] Ethiopia,[12] Saudi Arabia,[13] and Qatar.[14] Limited literature is available on consumer satisfaction of community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan. A qualitative study on patient anticipation for pharmacies in a rural community was performed in Southern Punjab.[15] A cross-sectional study was conducted on patient satisfaction with community pharmacy services in Punjab.[16] The above-cited literature works published internationally or locally lack knowledge of the theoretical foundation and factors that determine consumer satisfaction with community pharmacies. The researcher had constructed a four-factor model (PS, Skill of Pharmacist (SKP), non PS (NPS) and Pricing (P), adapted from 23 items from the literature.[4] The number of items inside PS, SKP, NPS, and P consisted of 9, 7, 6, and 1, respectively. Moreover, the current study's objective also identified the prevalence of consumer satisfaction with community pharmacies in Sindh, Pakistan.


An online cross-selection survey was conducted from January 21, 2020 to April 27, 2020 on a general population in Sindh, Pakistan. The authors followed the (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for observational studies to report this cross-sectional study.[17] The individuals were sent an online questionnaire using Google Forms through a convenience sampling method.[18] There was a total of 486 (n = 486) responses from the general population. Seventy-one responses (n = 71) had been excluded as they did not fall under the eligibility criteria, such as location or in-complete submission. Only four hundred and fifteen (n = 415) responses were considered for this study. The current population of Sindh is 47.88 million.[19] The sample size was calculated according to Taherdoost, 2017 (5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level).[20] All the questionnaires were translated into English and the local language (Urdu) for the population's convenience. The questionnaires were randomly shuffled using google shuffle questions to minimize the response bias.

In this study, IBM SPSS version (USA) 26[21] was used to analyze the descriptive statistics and frequency distribution for all the items. Pearson correlation, Kendall's tau_b, and Spearman's rho were used to identify the correlations among the SKP, price (P), NPS, and PS. IBM SPSS AMOS version 26 was used to evaluate the hypothetical model's fitness index.[22] All missing data were checked using Microsoft Excel and cross-checked using the SPSS software version 26 before analysis.

A hypothetical model [Figure 1] was developed from items that were identified from the literature published around the world in different countries, such as Brazil,[7] Slovakia,[8] Lebanon,[9] Nigeria,[10] Malaysia,[11] Ethiopia,[12] Saudi Arabia,[13] and Qatar.[14] The respondents were asked to respond using a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree).[23] The electronic survey form was developed using Google form.[24]{Figure 1}


The overall response rate was 85% (85.39%).[25] The Cronbach's alpha test of reliability was calculated as 0.787. Most of the respondents were graduates (52%) and aged between 18 and 14 years (79.4%). 67.7% of the population were residents in Karachi city. 61.4% of them were males and 81.2% of the population had never been married. As most of the population were graduates, 38.3% were not employed and were looking for work. The demographic profile is expressed in [Table 1]. [Figure 1] portrays the dimensional structure of our hypothesized nonorder factor model. The researcher used the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Fit indices to evaluate the fit of our model: Goodness-of-Fit index (GFI), Parsimony Normed Fit Index (NFI), Chi-square value (P CMIN/DF), and expected cross-validation index (ECVI), were also calculated. The fitness index values for the hypothetical model were P CMIN/DF (3.381), GFI (0.809), NFI (0.609), PCFI (0.622), RMSEA (0.076), FMIN (1.879), and ECVI (2.101). NCP (547.725), as mentioned in [Table 2]. The ideal value for RMSEA is <0.08, as stated by Bentler.[26] Different researchers have recommended using ratios as low as two or as high as 5 to indicate a good fit for CMIN/DF.[27] The CFI, NFI values close to 1 indicate a good fit. The level of acceptance for GFI is Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) >0.90.[28] Some important information was observed during the analysis of the frequency distribution. 34.9%, 31.6%, 40.7%, and 33.3% were neutral on the pharmacist's technical skills, the pharmacist's role in distributing information about routine health matters, prescription drug service, and immunization services, respectively. Unavailability of consultation room (41.9%), medication record (37.3%), health education, and health promotion services (28.7%) were also observed during the analysis. 67.5% of the population agreed that a receipt would be provided when they took their medicine. 56.2% agreed that the pharmacist listened to them. 56.4% also agreed that the pharmacy was available near home. 44.3% agreed that the pharmacy helped in treating common diseases and injuries. 51.8% agreed that the pharmacy was open on week ends and public holidays. The frequency distribution (%) of the responses to all the questionnaire items is mentioned in [Table 3].{Table 1}{Table 2}{Table 3}

According to the pearson correlation, positive correlations were observed between SKP and NPS (r = 0.143), (P = 0.004); SKP and PS (r = 0.615), (P = 0.000); NPS and PS (r = 0.182), (0.000) and P and PS (r = 0.288), (P = 0.000). According to Kendall's tau_b, positive correlations were observed between SKP and PS (r = 0.444), (P = 0.000); NPS and PS (r = 0.091), (P = 0.011); PS and P (r = 0.242), (0.000) and P and PS (r = 0.242), (P = 0.000). According to Spearman's rho, positive correlations were observed between SKP and PS (r = 0.581), (P = 0.000); NPS and PS (r = 0.124), (P = 0.011); PS and SKP (r = 0.581), (0.000) and P and PS (r = 0.303), (P = 0.000).


This study's principal research aim has been to develop a model and analyze the factors of 23-items associated with consumer satisfaction of community pharmacies. The items were adapted from Oparah and Kikanme, 2006,[4] which consisted of a 32-item rated instrument. The value of CMIN/DF was 3.381, which was below the upper limit of 5.0. The Goodness-of-fit index (GFI) values and Adjusted GFI (AGFI) were 0.809 and 0.841, respectively, which were less than the recommended level of 9. The reason for the below acceptable limit was a confidence level of 95%, with a 5% margin of error. However, for these few indices, which indicated a poor fit, the overall model fitness was good. Meesala and Paul worked on consumer satisfaction and found that patient satisfaction is directly related to their loyalty to the hospital.[29] Our result indicates that pharmaceutical services are directly related to price, NPS, and pharmacists' skills. The value of the Cronbach's alpha (0.787) was also present in an acceptable limit. The Cronbach's alpha test of reliability was computed to be 0.980 in a similar study from where items were adapted in a survey conducted in Nigeria (0.980).[4] A lower Cronbach's alpha was due to the low number of respondents (n = 415). The frequency distribution of several items matched a study conducted in Nigeria.[4] The consumer satisfaction level in Punjab was compared with our research, and a similar result was in the context of the patients' satisfaction with the dispensing and counseling practices. 36.8% of the Punjab population was not satisfied with the knowledge of counseling persons, whereas our study found 18.6% disagreed and 34.9% were neutral with the pharmacists' technical skill.[16] The researchers were unable to perform random sampling as there were no public data available of the general population of Sindh, Pakistan. Since the sampling frame was not known and the sample was not chosen randomly, there was inherent bias in the convenience sampling. The usage of technology in the rural population is limited, and the population was hard to reach as well in Sindh, so the majority of the questionnaires were will from Karachi.

Consumers were moderately satisfied with the community pharmacies in Sindh. They were neutral with the availability of the pharmacists' technical skills and dissatisfied with health-related information on routine matters, consultation rooms, and availability of medication records. The current research also indicates the relationships among the different factors, namely, PS, the SKP, NPS, and P.

 Authors' Contribution

Yun Jin Kim, Muhammad Shahzad Aslam and Linchao Qian. conceived the study idea. All authors contributed to the study design. Syed Muhammad Fahim and Waris Ali Khan performed the data collection. The analysis is performed by Muhammad Shahzad Aslam. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.


A humble thanks to Aftab Ahmed and Qurratul-ain Leghari for assisting with the collection of data. Special thanks to Aishah Rose Marie for her perseverance in proofreading the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

The Office of Research and Innovation, Xiamen University Malaysia, supported this work, grants number (XMUMRF/2020-C6/ITCM/0005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Eades CE, Ferguson JS, O'Carroll RE. Public health in community pharmacy: A systematic review of pharmacist and consumer views. BMC Public Health 2011;11:582.
2George PP, Molina JA, Cheah J, Chan SC, Lim BP. The evolving role of the community pharmacist in chronic disease management – A literature review. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010;39:861-7.
3Chang YW, Polonsky MJ. The influence of multiple types of service convenience on behavioral intentions: The mediating role of consumer satisfaction in a Taiwanese leisure setting. Int J Hosp Manag 2012;31:107-18.
4Oparah AC, Kikanme LC. Consumer satisfaction with community pharmacies in Warri, Nigeria. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2006;2:499-511.
5Nitadpakorn S, Farris KB, Kittisopee T. Factors affecting pharmacy engagement and pharmacy customer devotion in community pharmacy: A structural equation modeling approach. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2017;15:999.
6Freemantle N, Hill S. Evaluating Pharmaceuticals for Health Policy and Reimbursement. Wiley; 2004. Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 01].
7Soeiro OM, Tavares NU, Nascimento JM Do Jr., Guerra AA Jr., Costa EA, Acurcio F de A, et al. Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in Brazilian primary health care. Rev Saude Publica 2017;51 Suppl 2:21s.
8Mináriková D, Malovecká I, Lehocká Ŀ, Snopková M, Foltán V. The assessment of patient satisfaction and attendance of community pharmacies in Slovakia. Eur Pharm J 2016;63:23-9.
9Iskandar K, Hallit S, Bou Raad E, Droubi F, Layoun N, Salameh P. Community pharmacy in Lebanon: A societal perspective. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2017;15:893.
10Afolabi M, Afolabi E, Faleye B. Construct validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services in Nigerian hospitals. Afr Health Sci 2013;12:538-44.
11Bahari MB, Ling YW. Factors contributing to customer satisfaction with community pharmacies in Malaysia. Public Health (Bangkok) 2010;18:35-41.
12Teni FS, Workye M, Admasu S, Abura T, Belete Y, Getaye Y, et al. Clients & expectations from and satisfaction with medicine retail outlets in Gondar town, northwestern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Integr Pharm Res Pract 2015;1:1-2.
13Ahmed Alomi Y, Kurdy L, Aljarad Z, Basudan H, Almekwar B, Almahmood S. Patient satisfaction of pharmaceutical care of primary care centers at Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia. Pharm Pract Community Med 2016;2:79-87.
14El Hajj M, Mansoor, El Salem S. Public & attitudes towards community pharmacy in Qatar: A pilot study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011;5:405-22.
15Aziz M, Jiang M, Masood I, Chang J, Zhu S, Raza M, et al. Patients' anticipation for the pharmacies of rural communities: A qualitative study from Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:143.
16Aziz M, Ji W, Masood I, Farooq M, Malik M, Chang J, et al. Patient satisfaction with community pharmacies services: A cross-sectional survey from Punjab; Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:2914.
17von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014;12:1495-9.
18Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. SSRN Electron J 2016;5:2296-1747. Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 01].
19UNPO: Sindh. Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 11].
20Taherdoost H. Determining sample size; How to calculate survey sample size. Int J Econ Manag Syst 2017;2:237-9.
21George D, Mallery P. IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step. Routledge; 2019. Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 01].
22Blunch NJ. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. In: Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling using IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS. Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2017. p. 76-108.
23Summers R, Wang S, Abd-El-Khalick F, Said Z. Comparing likert scale functionality across culturally and linguistically diverse groups in science education research: An illustration using qatari students' responses to an attitude toward science survey. Int J Sci Math Educ 2019;17:885-903.
24Melo, S Advantages and Disadvantages of Google Form. Data Scope Website; 2018. Available from: [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 01].
25Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. Am J Pharm Educ 2008;72:43.
26Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 1999;6:1-55.
27Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 1985;97:562-82.
28Cheng SI. Comparisons of competing models between attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2011;2:2:149-166.
29Meesala A, Paul J. Service quality, consumer satisfaction and loyalty in hospitals: Thinking for the future. J Retail Consum Serv 2018;40:261-9.