Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 71--77

Effect of 2 mg versus 4 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid on bone mineral density at the lumbar Spine in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A Double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial


Harsh Durgia1, Sadishkumar Kamalanathan1, Govindarajalou Ramkumar2, Sonali Sarkar3, Sagili Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy4, Jayaprakash Sahoo1, Rajan Palui1, Henith Raj1 
1 Department of Endocrinology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
3 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
4 Vijay Diabetes, Thyroid and Endocrine Clinic, Saradambal Nagar, Puducherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jayaprakash Sahoo
Department of Endocrinology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry
India

Objective: The primary purpose was to compare the effect of 2 mg and 4 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA) on change in the lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) at the end of 1 year in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The secondary objectives were changes in BMD at the total hip and femoral neck, change in bone turnover markers (BTMs), and the incidence of new fractures. Methods: This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, randomized control trial with an allocation ratio of 1:1 done in 70 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Findings: The mean (±standard deviation) percentage increase in LS BMD at the end of 1 year was 4.86% ± 3.05% and 5.35% ± 3.73% in the 2 mg and 4 mg group, respectively. The dose of 2 mg ZA proved to be inferior to 4 mg with a noninferiority margin of 0.5%. There was no difference in BMD change at hip and BTMs between the two groups at the end of 1 year. Only one patient in 4 mg group developed two new vertebral fractures during a 12-month follow-up. Acute-phase reactions were the most common (43%) side-effects noted without any difference between the two groups (P = 0.63). Conclusion: This study failed to show the noninferiority of 2 mg ZA compared to 4 mg ZA for change in LS BMD at the end of 1 year.


How to cite this article:
Durgia H, Kamalanathan S, Ramkumar G, Sarkar S, Reddy SV, Sahoo J, Palui R, Raj H. Effect of 2 mg versus 4 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid on bone mineral density at the lumbar Spine in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A Double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial.J Res Pharm Pract 2021;10:71-77


How to cite this URL:
Durgia H, Kamalanathan S, Ramkumar G, Sarkar S, Reddy SV, Sahoo J, Palui R, Raj H. Effect of 2 mg versus 4 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid on bone mineral density at the lumbar Spine in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A Double-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. J Res Pharm Pract [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 28 ];10:71-77
Available from: https://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2021;volume=10;issue=2;spage=71;epage=77;aulast=Durgia;type=0