Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 334
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 196-201

A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of colistin loading dose in critically ill children

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Pediatrics; Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
6 Department of Pathology, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7 Department of Clinical Pharmacy; Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission02-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance15-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication27-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Toktam Faghihi
Department of Clinical Pharmacy; Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_19_68

Rights and Permissions

Objective: Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies recommend applying loading dose of colistin for the treatment of severe infections in the critically ill adults. Pharmacokinetic studies of colistin in children also highlight the need for a loading dose. However, there are no clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of colistin loading dose in children. Methods: In a randomized trial, children with ventilator-associated pneumonia or central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) for whom colistin was initiated, were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups; loading dose and conventional dose treatment arms. In the conventional treatment arm, colistimethate sodium was initiated with maintenance dose. In the loading dose group, colistimethate sodium was commenced with a loading dose of 150,000 international unit/kg, then on the maintenance dose. Both treatment arms also received meropenem as combination therapy. Primary outcomes were overall efficacy, clinical improvement and microbiological cure. Secondary outcomes were colistin-induced nephrotoxicity and development of resistance. Findings: Thirty children completed this study. There was a significantly higher overall efficacy in the group received loading dose (42.9 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.031). There weren't any significant differences in the clinical and microbiological endpoints. In the subgroup of children with CLABSI, results illustrated a trend toward (though statistically nonsignificant) better clinical cure for patients receiving loading dose. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that colistin loading dose might have some benefits in critically ill children, specifically in children with CLABSI. Further trials are required to elucidate colistin best dosing strategy in critically ill children with severe infections.

Keywords: Children, clinical efficacy, Colistin, loading dose, safety

How to cite this article:
Fatehi S, Eshaghi H, Sharifzadeh M, Mirrahimi B, Qorbani M, Tanzifi P, Gholami K, Faghihi T. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of colistin loading dose in critically ill children. J Res Pharm Pract 2019;8:196-201

How to cite this URL:
Fatehi S, Eshaghi H, Sharifzadeh M, Mirrahimi B, Qorbani M, Tanzifi P, Gholami K, Faghihi T. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of colistin loading dose in critically ill children. J Res Pharm Pract [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 8];8:196-201. Available from: https://www.jrpp.net/text.asp?2019/8/4/196/274159

  Introduction Top

Colistin, a polymyxin antibiotic, was utilized in practice since 1959 but its therapeutic use was limited in the 1970s due to concerns on drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Increasing rates of infections due to extensively drug resistance (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria along with the limited number of new antimicrobial agents being introduced, led to reappraisal of colistin in clinical practice without sufficient pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies.[1],[2],[3] Thus, the best dosing strategy of colistin remains to be elucidated.[4],[5]

A leading population pharmacokinetic study of colistin in critically ill adults by Plachouras et al., revealed that 2–3 days will take for colistin to reach the desired concentration and was the pioneer study to propose that loading dose would improve initial colistin concentrations.[4],[6] Further pharmacokinetic studies in adults also supported the loading dose concept[7],[8] while some challenged the concept.[9] In line with pharmacokinetic studies, clinical studies also evaluated the efficacy and safety of loading dose in adults[10],[11],[12],[13] with variable results. Despite the limited number of clinical trials in this field and the variable results, consensus and the medication monograph warrants administration of a loading dose of 9 MIU in critically ill adults.[3],[4],[5],[14]

On the other hand, few pharmacokinetics studies of colistin loading dose are available in the pediatric population. Antachopoulos et al. demonstrated that with the current dosing regimen, therapeutic concentration of colistin will not be achieved in pediatric patients.[15] A pharmacokinetic study by Mesini et al. demonstrated that after administrating 150,000 I. U/kg loading dose of colistin all pediatric patients achieve the desired area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) for pathogens with MIC <2 mg/L and suggested considering loading dose in the pediatric population.[16] However, the study results have been greatly challenged,[17],[18],[19] and it should be acknowledged that it still remains uncertain whether the dosage of 150,000 international unit (IU)/kg/day of colistimethate sodium employed by Mesini et al. provides adequate exposure for colistin in children. Recently, a study of population pharmacokinetics of intravenous colistin in pediatric patients revealed that current dosage recommendations may be suboptimal for many children.[20] Putting together there is paucity of data on colistin pharmacokinetics and best dosing strategy in children.

To the extent of our knowledge, there are no clinical studies evaluating loading dose of colistin in critically ill children. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of incorporating colistin loading dose in a cohort of critically ill children with nosocomial infections due to XDR Gram-negative bacteria.

  Methods Top

This parallel, randomized clinical trial was accomplished in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) of two referral teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran and Shahid Beheshti Universities of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from December 2016 to June 2018. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee (IR.TUMS.PSRC.REC.1396.2744) and registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20170614034532N2). Written informed consent was obtained from the Children's guardians.

All critically ill children aged 1 month–18 years old with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) that had a positive specimen with polymyxin-only-susceptible (POS) Gram-negative bacteria were included. Exclusion criteria were: (i) patients with previous renal failure (acute or chronic), (ii) previous treatment with colistin in the current admission, (iii) treatment with other antibiotics targeted Gram-negative bacteria except for meropenem, (iv) received colistin for <72 h and/or (v) receiving colistin by inhalation.

Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, results of laboratory tests, cultures and medication history specifically concurrent nephrotoxic drugs were recorded for each patient. Pediatric risk of mortality score III on PICU admission was also calculated.

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (loading dose) or to the control arm (conventional dose) by permuted block randomization. In the loading dose group patients received 150,000 IU/kg colistimethate sodium (Forest laboratories; Ireland), based on actual body weight intravenously (IV) as loading dose over 1 h infusion as soon as the diagnosis of VAP or CLABSI had been made. After 12 h, maintenance dose of 150,000 IU/kg/day colistimethate sodium divided every 8 h IV was commenced. In the conventional dose group patients received 150,000 IU/kg/day colistimethate sodium divided every 8 h IV without loading dose. In both treatment groups patients also received meropenem 30 mg/kg/q8 h IV as combination therapy with colistin. Participants were followed 72 h from beginning of colistin therapy for efficacy outcomes.

Primary outcomes were overall efficacy, clinical improvement and microbiological response. Clinical improvement was defined as alleviation in signs such as fever, leukocytosis and for VAP also as improvement of all baseline signs and symptoms associated with pneumonia such as hypoxemia, increased or purulent secretions and respiratory status.

Microbiological response was defined as microbiologically clearance of the isolated causative organism. Overall efficacy was defined as achieving both clinical and microbiological response. Overall efficacy, clinical improvement and microbiological response were assessed after 72 h after the antimicrobial regimen commencement.

Secondary outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute kidney injury (AKI) and development of resistance to colistin. To explore the probable effect of a loading dose on AKI development, we used the pediatric modification of the RIFLE definition (pRIFLE) criteria [Table 1]. In this regard, serum creatinine (Scr) concentration and estimated creatinine clearance based on Schwartz formula of participants were recorded daily from the 1st day of colistin therapy for 4 days.[21],[22] For pRIFLE criteria severity grading, the maximum Scr value achieved in the follow-up was compared with the baseline Scr. The lowest Scr level in the last 3 months before starting colistin was considered as the baseline of Scr level of the patient.[22] Data on concomitant nephrotoxic medications were collected during colistin use. Concomitant nephrotoxins recorded were aminoglycosides, acyclovir, ganciclovir, vancomycin, amphotericin B, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intravenous contrast media, loop diuretics, cyclosporine, tacrolimus and vasopressors.
Table 1: Pediatric RIFLE classification of acute kidney injury

Click here to view

Resistance to colistin was evaluated in children with a second positive organism after 72 h of therapy and was defined if the second MIC was at least twice as much as the first one.[23]

An isolate was defined as POS if it was susceptible to colistin but resistant to antipseudomonal penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones.[24] To determine the microbiological sensitivity, clinical and laboratory standards institute guidelines has been used.[25] The sensitivity of specimens to colistin was assessed by E-test and the MIC of ≤2 mg/l was considered sensitive. VAP was defined based on the imaging, clinical and laboratory findings and CLABSI was defined based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition.[26]

Statistical analysis was done based on SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were presented as median (for quantitative variables) or percentage (for qualitative variables). Mann–Whitney U analysis was used for continuous nonparametric varieties. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

  Results Top

Of 53 children with VAP or CLABSI that had a POS culture, thirty children completed the study (14 patients in the loading dose group and 16 patients in the conventional dose group) [Figure 1]. The clinical characteristics of patients are outlined in [Table 2].
Figure 1: CONSORT flow diagram

Click here to view
Table 2: Clinical characteristics of the studied patients

Click here to view

Clinical outcome data are depicted in [Table 3]. As shown in [Table 3], there was a statistically significant difference in terms of overall efficacy between the 2 treatment arms. However, no statistically significant difference was noted in clinical improvement and microbiological response between the two treatment groups.
Table 3: Clinical efficacy data

Click here to view

To further explore the effect of underlying disease on outcomes, participants were categorized in the following groups; VAP and CLABSI and the probable effect of loading dose on primary outcomes was assessed in each, separately. In subgroup of children with VAP, there was no statistically difference in clinical improvement and microbiological response between those receiving loading dose and standard treatment (P = 0.714 and P = 0.185, respectively). In the subgroup of children with CLABSI, results illustrated a trend toward (though statistically nonsignificant) better clinical cure for patients receiving loading dose compared with standard treatment.

In our study, AKI was detected in only two patients based on p-RIFLE criteria. One child in the loading dose group (7.1%) and one in the standard dose group (6.3%); P = 1. Both cases were stage R and received nephrotoxic drugs concomitantly with colistin. The time to AKI onset was on day 1 and day 4 of treatment. AKI was successfully reversed by supportive treatment.

Among children with a second positive POS organism after 72 h of treatment, MIC was not increased, thus no cases of resistance to colistin were observed.

  Discussion Top

To our knowledge, the present study is the first randomized clinical trial evaluating clinical effects and safety of colistin loading dose in critically ill children. Results of current study illustrated improved overall efficacy with such a regimen without further jeopardizing renal function.

In adult critically ill patients, data regarding benefits of administrating a loading dose of colistin are derived from pharmacokinetic researches and clinical studies that were mainly observational.[4],[5] The idea was first proposed by Plachouras et al. and Garonzik et al.[6],[27] In corroboration with the above pioneer trials, three pharmacokinetic studies applied a loading dose and measured colistin concentration in adult patients.[7],[8],[9] Mohamed et al. used a loading dose of 6 MU colistin in 10 critically ill adults and noticed average Cmax of 1.34 mg/l at 8 h after loading dose.[7] Karaiskos et al. applied loading dose of 9 MU, and observed average Cmax of 2.65 mg/l after 8 h, a concentration that well exceeded the desired target for bacterial kill.[8] However, Grégoire et al. pharmacokinetic study challenged this dosing strategy.[9] The discrepancies observed in plasma concentrations could be attributed to colistin solution preparation, storage, and infusion time.[5]

Several clinical studies performed in adults also evaluated efficacy and safety of loading dose[10],[11],[12],[13] with variable results. Dalfino et al. trial was the first published study evaluating efficacy of 9 MU loading dose of colistin in critically ill adults, and reported 82% clinical cure and 73% microbiological response. Nephrotoxicity was observed in 17.8% of patients.[10] In a comparative study of 2 matched series by Trifi et al., which evaluated both a higher dose and loading dose of colistin, there was a higher rate of clinical cure in the loading dose colistin group than standard dose group (63 vs. 41.3%, P = 0.04) without increasing in the risk for renal toxicity.[11] As mentioned, in the study the two groups also differed in the total daily dose of colistin administered and the observed difference could be attributed to both interventions. Elefritz et al. evaluated the effects of colistin loading of 5 mg/kg/colistin base activity (CBA) with a high maintenance dose (7 mg/kg CBA/day) dose in critically ill adults with VAP. The majority of the patients also received inhaled colistin. The study compared outcomes pre- and post-implementation period. The authors did not observe increased clinical cure after implementation of loading dose. There was no difference in time to clinical cure and in-hospital mortality. However, loading dose was not associated with increased incidence of AKI. The authors concluded that loading dose was not a predictor of clinical cure while there is an opportunity to optimized colistin dosing. However, the study was underpowered to detect such an effect.[12] In a cohort study by Katip et al., patients received 300-mg CBA as loading dose followed by maintenance dose 150 mg CBA twice daily. Compared with comparator group who only received maintenance dose, improved microbiological clearance was noted and the incidence of nephrotoxicity was similar in the two groups. The authors proposed high loading dose as a safe and effective strategy.[13]

Putting together, although the results of pharmacokinetic, observational and clinical trials are still inconclusive;[5] and the best loading dose and several aspects regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of colistin are still debated, most authorities recommend applying loading dose in adult critically ill.[2],[3],[4],[14]

In the pediatric population, fewer data are available. Antachopoulos et al. pharmacokinetic study in 3 patients aged 1.5 months to 14 years who received IV colistin (60,000–225,000 IU/kg/d), only in one of the five courses of colistin treatment (14 years old taking 225,000 IU/kg/d), did serum concentration exceed the 2 mg/l.[15]

The present study was the first clinical trial evaluating colistin loading dose in pediatrics. We did not observe increase microbiological and clinical improvement separately which could be attributed to the small sample size. However, when clinical and microbiological response were assessed together as overall efficacy, improved outcomes with loading dose was observed. Of note, when participants with CLABSIs were analyzed, clinical improvement was nearly significant. This issue could be interpreted as children with CLABSI may benefit more of applying loading dose compared with children with VAP. This suggests the concept that inhaled colistin might be a much more critical determinant of clinical efficacy in VAP patients compared to loading dose; since it generates a high local concentration. This issue needs to be defined in larger clinical trials.

In our study incidence of AKI was similar after administrating loading dose. In line with this finding, currently available data has not illustrated a higher risk of AKI with loading dose.[5]

This study had a number of limitations. First, we had a small sample size. Second, there was a short period of follow-up. However, we wanted to assess successfulness of prescribing a loading dose of colistin in the critical initial hours of infection. If the study was designed to assess clinical efficacy and nephrotoxicity of colistin in critically ill pediatrics, mortality and length of ICU and hospital stay had to be assessed and a longer follow-up was needed, respectively. Further trials with survival analysis and length of hospitalization assessment are suggested. Third we could not assess colistin neurotoxicity including apnea with administration of loading dose.

The present study is the first randomized trial that evaluated the efficacy of a loading dose of colistin in critically ill children. This preliminary study suggested that loading dose might have improved outcomes, especially in patients with CLABSIs. Further clinical trials with larger sample size are needed to shed light on the best dosing strategy of this last-resort antibiotic and to aid in medical decision-making.

  Authors' Contribution Top

Shiva Fatehi selected patients, obtained and interpreted data, done literature research, drafted the manuscript. Hamid Eshaghi designed the study, selected patients, obtained, interpreted data and defined the intellectual content. Meisam Sharifzadeh selected patients, obtained, interpreted data and defined the intellectual content. Bahador Mirrahimi selected patients and obtained data. Mostafa Qorbani carried out statistical analysis. Parin Tanzifi obtained and interpreted data. Toktam Faghihi contributed in concept, defined the intellectual content, designed the study, done literature research, interpreted the data, drafted and revised the manuscript. Kheirollah Gholami defined the intellectual content, contributed in concept, designed and supervised the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was financially supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Colistin: The revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:1333-41.  Back to cited text no. 1
Landersdorfer CB, Nation RL. Colistin: How should it be dosed for the critically ill? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015;36:126-35.  Back to cited text no. 2
Thomas R, Velaphi S, Ellis S, Walker AS, Standing JF, Heath P, et al. The use of polymyxins to treat carbapenem resistant infections in neonates and children. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019;20:415-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
Nazer LH, Anabtawi N. Optimizing colistin dosing: Is a loading dose necessary? Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017;74:e9-16.  Back to cited text no. 4
Vardakas KZ, Rellos K, Triarides NA, Falagas ME. Colistin loading dose: Evaluation of the published pharmacokinetic and clinical data. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016;48:475-84.  Back to cited text no. 5
Plachouras D, Karvanen M, Friberg LE, Papadomichelakis E, Antoniadou A, Tsangaris I, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of colistin methanesulfonate and colistin after intravenous administration in critically ill patients with infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:3430-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
Mohamed AF, Karaiskos I, Plachouras D, Karvanen M, Pontikis K, Jansson B, et al. Application of a loading dose of colistin methanesulfonate in critically ill patients: Population pharmacokinetics, protein binding, and prediction of bacterial kill. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:4241-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
Karaiskos I, Friberg LE, Pontikis K, Ioannidis K, Tsagkari V, Galani L, et al. Colistin population pharmacokinetics after application of a loading dose of 9 MU colistin methanesulfonate in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:7240-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
Grégoire N, Mimoz O, Mégarbane B, Comets E, Chatelier D, Lasocki S, et al. New colistin population pharmacokinetic data in critically ill patients suggesting an alternative loading dose rationale. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:7324-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
Dalfino L, Puntillo F, Mosca A, Monno R, Spada ML, Coppolecchia S, et al. High-dose, extended-interval colistin administration in critically ill patients: Is this the right dosing strategy? A preliminary study. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1720-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
Trifi A, Abdellatif S, Daly F, Mahjoub K, Nasri R, Oueslati M, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of high-dose colistin in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli infections: A comparative study of a matched series. Chemotherapy 2016;61:190-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
Elefritz JL, Bauer KA, Jones C, Mangino JE, Porter K, Murphy CV, et al. Efficacy and safety of a colistin loading dose, high-dose maintenance regimen in critically ill patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative pneumonia. J Intensive Care Med 2017;32:487-93.  Back to cited text no. 12
Katip W, Meechoui M, Thawornwittayakom P, Chinwong D, Oberdorfer P. Efficacy and safety of high loading dose of colistin in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2017. doi: 10.1177/0885066617725694. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 13
Grégoire N, Aranzana-Climent V, Magréault S, Marchand S, Couet W. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of colistin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017;56:1441-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
Antachopoulos C, Karvanen M, Iosifidis E, Jansson B, Plachouras D, Cars O, et al. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of colistin in pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:3985-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
Mesini A, Loy A, Gattorno M, Moscatelli A, Bandettini R, Faraci M, et al. Colistin area under the time-concentration in children treated with intravenous loading dose and maintenance therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:808-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
Magréault S, Grégoire N, Marchand S, Couet W. Colistin pharmacokinetics in pediatrics. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:809.  Back to cited text no. 17
Nation RL. Dose suggestions for intravenous colistin in pediatric patients: Caution required. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:810-1.  Back to cited text no. 18
Barco S, Castagnola E, Mesini A, Tripodi G, Cangemi G. Potential pitfalls in LC-MS/MS quantification of colistin for therapeutic drug monitoring of patients treated with colistimethate. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2019;170:193-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
Ooi MH, Ngu SJ, Chor YK, Li J, Landersdorfer CB, Nation RL, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous colistin in pediatric patients: Implications for selection of dosage regimens. Clin Infect Dis 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz067.  Back to cited text no. 20
Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr., Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976;58:259-63.  Back to cited text no. 21
Akcan-Arikan A, Zappitelli M, Loftis LL, Washburn KK, Jefferson LS, Goldstein SL, et al. Modified RIFLE criteria in critically ill children with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2007;71:1028-35.  Back to cited text no. 22
Tamma PD, Newland JG, Pannaraj PS, Metjian TA, Banerjee R, Gerber JS, et al. The use of intravenous colistin among children in the United States: Results from a multicenter, case series. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013;32:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 23
Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK, Kofteridis DP, Roditakis G, Samonis G. Effectiveness and nephrotoxicity of intravenous colistin for treatment of patients with infections due to polymyxin-only-susceptible (POS) gram-negative bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25:596-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Standards Development Policies and Process; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 25
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309-32.  Back to cited text no. 26
Garonzik SM, Li J, Thamlikitkul V, Paterson DL, Shoham S, Jacob J, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulfonate and formed colistin in critically ill patients from a multicenter study provide dosing suggestions for various categories of patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3284-94.  Back to cited text no. 27


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children
Steven Kwasi Korang, Chiara Nava, Sutharshini Punniyamoorthy Mohana, Ulrikka Nygaard, Janus C Jakobsen
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021; 2021(11)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Authors' Con...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded365    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal